| Teach Our Kids! | |
|
"As
a public educational institution, the Plymouth-Canton Community School
District will lead our state in educating students to thrive in a complex
global community"
P-CCS Website |
|
|
Does P-CCS
fulfill this pledge? For the Elementary Math program, the answer is "NO".
|
|
| Glossary | P-CCS Curriculum |
|
Research: What Can I Do? Other Districts: |
|
Mathematics fundamentals get new life Inside Bay Area THERE are prodigies - children who have an inexplicable, innate ability to perform virtuoso mental, artistic or physical feats - but for the vast majority of human beings, acquiring skills is a more laborious process. Simply put, we must crawl before we can walk, walk before we can run, and run before we can aspire to higher levels. Mental development is fundamentally
no different. Most of us may be born with the potential to learn - to
gain knowledge and reasoning skills - but realizing that potential takes
hard work and good instruction. Educational concepts that
had stood generations of Americans in good stead - phonics-based reading,
memorizing multiplication tables, basic rules of grammar - were cast
aside in the 1970s and 1980s in favor of reforms that reflected the
moral relativism of the age and would, their advocates insisted, make
learning more fun. A 1989 decree by the National
Council of Mathematics Teachers typified the trend, casting aside such
concepts as multiplication tables in favor of what came to be known
as fuzzy math that favored estimates over exactitude and assumed that
everyone would always use a calculator. Innumeracy - a chronic inability
to understand and apply mathematics to work and daily life - is rampant,
and the abysmally poor performance of American children in international
mathematics test comparisons is graphic proof that fuzzy math is an
abject failure. For nearly two decades, math wars have raged in academic
and political circles over what children should learn. And California
has been a major front. Hostilities erupted in California
during the mid-1990s when then-Gov. Pete Wilson and legislators, prodded
the state Board of Education to adopt new standards. Marion Joseph,
a one-time top state education official, came out of retirement to take
a seat on the state board and lead the charge for change. An advisory panel recommended
standards that moved toward more mathematical fundamentals, but the
state board put even more emphasis on basics and adopted them after
a battle with Delaine Eastin, then-state schools superintendent. Some states followed Californias
model and others continued a fuzzier version of math. But Joseph and
the other back-to-basics advocates appear to be having the last laugh.
With the nation moving toward national academic standards, but with
huge differences in approaches among the states, the National Council
of Mathematics Teachers has revisited the issue and in a new encyclical
has figuratively abandoned the fuzzy approach and recommended grade-by-grade
guidelines that move substantially back to fundamentals. You have to wade through
reams of jargon to find the changes. The guidelines dont use the term
multiplication tables, for example, but say that kids in elementary
school should become proficient in multiplication facts. Leaders of
the math teachers council are reluctant to say that there is a major
change, instead describing the new guidelines as building on previous
suggestions. But a side-by-side comparison indicates that what the council
is proposing and what California adopted a decade ago are quite similar.
Readin, ritin and rithmetic
- maybe theres some hope for the three Rs after all. Dan Walters writes for the Sacramento Bee. |
© Copyright 2006 TeachOurKids.net All Rights Reserved.